Captain’s log, stardate 20210803
Fellow list member Alison Eaton wrote in with a follow-up question to my recent Strictly speaking... email.
I think you might find the ensuing thread helpful (shared with permission, lightly edited for clarity):
Jonathan love your posts. Are you saying here that a thing is worth what someone will pay for it?
What something is worth is different to everyone who considers it.
What something is worth to Bob can be defined as “the maximum amount that Bob would pay for it” but that doesn’t mean that the thing is worth that same amount to Carol.
Does that help?
Yes thanks for clarifying. So if it is not worth enough to Bob, I might need to look to “John” if it is worth more to John.
Change the client not the price. I like it.
Exactly! Yes, change the client not the price.
The key takeaway here is that thoughts like “Clients need to pay me what I’m worth!” are usually misguided because they imply an objective definition of what something is worth.
If the clients you’re currently attracting are not willing to pay you what you think you are worth, the problem ISN’T that these clients need to be educated about how hard your job is, or shamed into paying you a living wage, or otherwise guilted into a price that is acceptable to you.
The real problem is that you are attracting the wrong kind of clients.
Enjoy this message? Here are more things you might like:
Private Coaching with Jonathan - Has your successful software business plateaued? Break through to the next level with my private coaching program. Sorry! SOLD OUT through the end of 2021.
Group Coaching with Jonathan - Live group video Q&A sessions every other week, instant access to years of previous sessions, and a dedicated Slack for group discussion.
How To Build Your First Productized Service - A Step-By-Step Guide For Independent Professionals Who Want More Clients Without More Selling