<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value Billing for Software Projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanstark.com/blog/2009/11/16/value-billing-for-software-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanstark.com/blog/2009/11/16/value-billing-for-software-projects/</link>
	<description>Mobile application strategy, design, and development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:18:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mullins</title>
		<link>http://jonathanstark.com/blog/2009/11/16/value-billing-for-software-projects/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanstark.com/blog/?p=368#comment-714</guid>
		<description>I look forward to the future posts about the subject.  Something about this approach feels right, but it isn&#039;t something I would be able to say why I think it feels right.  It will be nice to get further information so that I can make that determination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to the future posts about the subject.  Something about this approach feels right, but it isn&#8217;t something I would be able to say why I think it feels right.  It will be nice to get further information so that I can make that determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://jonathanstark.com/blog/2009/11/16/value-billing-for-software-projects/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanstark.com/blog/?p=368#comment-671</guid>
		<description>In conversations with other developers about value-based billing, I&#039;ve heard (and share) concerns that you can potentially get yourself into a bad situation if scope creep enters a project. If you&#039;re committing to a fixed price for a project, then you&#039;ve got be very sure that the expectations of the client are very clearly defined. I&#039;m wondering if you agree with that or not. 

I&#039;m also wondering if you build into your proposal the time that will be involved in determining what the scope of work really is? Are your proposals extremely detailed? (I&#039;m suspecting that they&#039;re not, and wonder how you manage to pull that off!)

And finally, what do you do in situations where, after a project has landed, you realize that your expectations are quite different from those of the client?

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, ideas, and experience regarding value-based billing. You&#039;ve certainly giving us something to think about!

-- Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In conversations with other developers about value-based billing, I&#8217;ve heard (and share) concerns that you can potentially get yourself into a bad situation if scope creep enters a project. If you&#8217;re committing to a fixed price for a project, then you&#8217;ve got be very sure that the expectations of the client are very clearly defined. I&#8217;m wondering if you agree with that or not. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also wondering if you build into your proposal the time that will be involved in determining what the scope of work really is? Are your proposals extremely detailed? (I&#8217;m suspecting that they&#8217;re not, and wonder how you manage to pull that off!)</p>
<p>And finally, what do you do in situations where, after a project has landed, you realize that your expectations are quite different from those of the client?</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts, ideas, and experience regarding value-based billing. You&#8217;ve certainly giving us something to think about!</p>
<p>&#8211; Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
